Level III and IV Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain

Metadata also available as

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: US Environmental Protection Agency
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: Level III and IV Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain
Edition: v1
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Online_Linkage: <ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/map/>
Description:
Abstract:
Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999). These general purpose regions are critical for structuring and implementing ecosystem management strategies across federal agencies, state agencies, and non-government organizations that are responsible for different types of resources within the same geographical areas (Omernik and others, 2000). The approach used to compile this map is based on the premise that ecological regions can be identified through the analysis of the spatial patterns and the composition of biotic and abiotic phenomena that affect or reflect differences in ecosystem quality and integrity (Wiken, 1986; Omernik, 1987, 1995). These phenomena include geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. The relative importance of each characteristic varies from one ecological region to another regardless of the hierarchical level. A Roman numeral hierarchical scheme has been adopted for different levels of ecological regions. Level I is the coarsest level, dividing North America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions (Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997). At level III, the continental United States contains 104 ecoregions and the conterminous United States has 84 ecoregions (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], 2003). Level IV is a further subdivision of level III ecoregions. Explanations of the methods used to define the USEPA's ecoregions are given in Omernik (1995), Omernik and others (2000), Griffith and others (1994), and Gallant and others (1989). This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Planning Team (MAWPT), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and U.S. Department of Interior - U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) - Earth Resources Observation Systems (EROS) Data Center. This project is associated with an interagency effort to develop a common framework of ecological regions. Reaching that objective requires recognition of the differences in the conceptual approaches and mapping methodologies that have been used to develop the most common ecoregion-type frameworks, including those developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service (USFS) (Bailey and others, 1994), the USEPA (Omernik, 1987, 1995), and the NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, 1981). As each of these frameworks is further refined, their differences are becoming less discernible. Regional collaborative projects such as this one in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain, where agreement can be reached among multiple resource management agencies, are a step toward attaining consensus and consistency in ecoregion frameworks for the entire nation. Comments and questions regarding this Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain map should be addressed to Shannen Chapman, Dynamac, Inc., 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, (541) 754-4493, FAX: (541) 754-4716, email: chapman.shannen@epa.gov, or to James Omernik, USGS, c/o US EPA - NHEERL, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, (541) 754-4458, email: omernik.james@epa.gov.
Purpose:
Assist managers of aquatic and terrestrial resources in understanding the regional patterns of the realistically attainable quality of these resources.
Supplemental_Information:
Revisions

1. Original level III lines digitized 1986

2. Updated level III and IV lines. 12/2003

3. Updated level III and IV lines as per edits to AR and LA. 3/2004

Reviews_Applied_to_Data

1. Lines and map were reviewed by multiple state and federal personnel.

2. Revised lines were reviewed by Shannen Chapman, Dynamac, Inc., c/o US EPA

3. Revisions were reviewed by Shannen Chapman, Dynamac, Inc., c/o US EPA

REFERENCES

Anderson, J.R., 1970, Major land uses, in The national atlas of the United States of America: Washington, D.C., U.S. Geological Survey, p. 158-159, map scale 1:7,500,000.

Bailey, R.G., 1995, Description of the ecoregions of the United States (2d ed.): Miscellaneous Publication no. 1391, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, 108 p. + map.

Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, map scale 1:7,500,000.

Barnes, C.P., and Marschner, F.J., 1933, Natural land-use areas of the United States (map): U.S. Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Agricultural Economics, map scale: 1:4,000,000.

Beccasio, A.D., and others, 1983, Lower Mississippi valley ecological inventory - user's guide and information base: Washington, D.C., National Coastal Ecosystems Team, Division of Biological Services, United States Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service, 84 p.

Bickner, A.R., Jr., compiler, 1969 (reprinted 1985), Geologic map of Mississippi: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Geological Survey, map scale 1:500,000.

Booth, D.C, and Schmitz, D.W., compilers, 1983, Economic minerals map of Mississippi: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Bureau of Geology and Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute, map scale 1:500,000.

Chapman, S.S., Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Beiser, M.C., and Johnson, D., In press, Ecoregions of Mississippi (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey, map scale 1:1,000,000.

Chapman, S.S., Omernik, J.M., Griffith, G.E., Schroeder, W.A., Nigh, T.A., and Wilton, T.F., 2002, Ecoregions of Iowa and Missouri (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey, map scale 1:1,800,000.

Christensen, N.L., 1988, Vegetation of the southeastern Coastal Plain, in Barbour, M.G., and Billings, W.D., eds., North American terrestrial vegetation: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 317-363.

Cook, F.A., 1959, Freshwater fishes in Mississippi: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Game and Fish Commission, 239 p.

Cross, R.D., Wales, R.W., and Traylor, C.T., 1974, Atlas of Mississippi: Jackson, Mississippi, University Press of Mississippi, 187 p.

Delcourt, H.R., and Delcourt, P.A., 1975, The blufflands - Pleistocene pathway into the Tunica Hills: American Midland Naturalist, v. 94, no. 2, p. 385-400.

Dunston, C.E., 1910, Preliminary examination of the forest conditions of Mississippi: Mississippi State Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 7, p. 1-76.

Federal Writers' Project, Works Progress Administration, 1938, Mississippi, a guide to the magnolia state: New York, Viking Press, 545 p.

Frayer, W.E., Monahan, M.J., Bowden, D.C., and Graybill, F.A., 1983, Status and trends of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950's to 1970's: Fort Collins, Colorado, Colorado State University, 31 p.

Frey, H.T., and Dill, H.W., Jr., 1971, Land use change in the southern Mississippi alluvial valley, 1950-1969 - an analysis based on remote sensing: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report 215, 26 p.

Goins, C.R., and Caldwell, J.M., 1995, Historical atlas of Louisiana: Norman, Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma Press, 45 p.

Griffith, G., Omernik, J., and Azevedo, S., 1998, Ecoregions of Tennessee (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey, map scale 1:940,000.

Guccione, M.J., Prior, W.L., and Rutledge, E.M., 1986, The Tertiary and Quaternary geology of Crowley's Ridge: Little Rock, Arkansas, Arkansas Geological Commission Guidebook GB 86-4, Arkansas Geological Commission, 39 p.

Haley, B.R., and others, 1993, Geologic map of Arkansas: Reston, Virginia, prepared cooperatively by the Arkansas Geological Commission and the U.S. Geological Survey, map scale 1:500,000.

Hamel, P.B., and Foti, T.L., technical eds., 2001, Bottomland hardwoods of the Mississippi Alluvial Valley - characteristics and management of natural function, structure and composition, (proceedings of a symposium held during the Natural Areas Conference, Fayetteville, Arkansas, October 28, 1995): Asheville, North Carolina, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service - Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-042, 111 p.

Hanson, G.T., 1989, Historical atlas of Arkansas: Norman, Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma Press, 142 p.

Heggem, D.T., Neale, A.C., Edmonds, C.M., Bice, L.A., Van Remortel, R.D., and Jones, K.B., 1999, An ecological assessment of the Louisiana Tensas River Basin: Washington, D.C., EPA/600/R-99/016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 123 p.

Highsaw, R.B., 1949, The Delta looks forward - an inventory of natural and human resources: Stoneville, Mississippi, The Delta Council, 144 p.

Hudson, J.C., 1979, The Yazoo Delta as plantation country, in Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Ecology and Management Conference: Tallahassee, Florida, Tall Timbers Research Station, p. 34-52.

Jackson, D.C., and Jackson, J.R., 1989, A glimmer of hope for stream fisheries in Mississippi: Fisheries, v. 14, no. 3, p. 4-9.

James, D.A., and Neal, J.C., 1986, Arkansas birds - their distribution and abundance: Fayetteville, Arkansas, University of Arkansas Press, 402 p.

Joseph, R.L., 1999, Status of water levels and selected water-quality conditions in the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer in eastern Arkansas, 1998: Denver, Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey, prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission and the Arkansas Geological Commission, 54 p.

Kelley, A., 1978, Sequent occupancy of the Yazoo basin, Mississippi, 1830 to 1976: Mississippi Geographer, v. 6, p. 3-18.

Keys, J.E., Jr., Carpenter, C.A., Hooks, S.L., Koenig, F.G., McNab, W.H., Russell, W.E., Smith, M.L., 1995, Ecological units of the eastern United States - first approximation (map and booklet of map unit tables): Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, Technical Publication R8-TP 21, map scale 1:3,500,000.

Kleiss, B.A, Coupe, R.H., Gonthier, G.J., and Justus, B.G., 2000, Water quality in the Mississippi Embayment, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, and Kentucky, 1995-98: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1208, 44 p.

Klimas, C.V., 1988, Forest vegetation of the leveed floodplain of the Lower Mississippi River: Vicksburg, Mississippi, Environmental Program Report 11, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Mississippi River Commission, 281 p.

Loveland, T.R., Merchant, J.W., Brown, J.F., Ohlen, D.O., Reed, B.C., Olsen, P., and Hutchinson, J., 1995, Seasonal land-cover regions of the United States: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 85, no. 2, p. 339-355.

Lowe, E.N., 1921, Plants of Mississippi: Mississippi State Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 17, p. 1-293.

Mississippi Automated Resource Information System (MARIS), 1991, State of Mississippi general land use: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Automated Resource Information System, map scale 1:500,000.

Mississippi Bureau of Pollution Control Laboratory, 1987, Ambient biological monitoring report 1985-1986: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Natural Resources, 192 p.

Mississippi Geological Survey, 1975, Relief map: Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi Geological Survey, map scale 1:1,000,000.

Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission, 1996, Mississippi River corridor study: Washington, D.C., Mississippi State Department of Agriculture and Commerce, 39 p.

Mueller, A.J., Tweet, D.J., and Loesch, C.R., 1999, Development of management objectives for breeding birds in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, in Bonney, R., Pashley, D.N., Cooper, R., and Niles, L., eds., Strategies for Bird Conservation: Cornell Lab of Ornitholgy. The Partners in Flight Planning Process, <http://birds.cornell.edu/pifcapemay/>.

Pike, R.W., Waller, E.N., and Hendershot, P.T., 1969, Mississippi in maps, 1969 - features, agriculture, resources, industry: University, Mississippi, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, 78 p.

Prenshaw, P.W., and McKee, J.O., eds., 1979, Sense of place, Mississippi: Jackson, Mississippi, University Press of Mississippi, 229 p.

Rudis, V.A., and Birdsey, R.A., 1987, Forest resource trends and current conditions in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley: New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Research Bulletin SO-116, 7 p.

Saucier, R.T., 1994, Geomorphology and Quaternary geologic history of the Lower Mississippi Valley, volume I (report), volume II (map folio): Vicksburg, Mississippi, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station.

Southern Alluvial Land Association, 1920, The west side delta, containing authentic information about the super-soil region of eastern Arkansas and eastern Louisiana, two parts of the alluvial empire: Memphis, Tennessee, Southern Alluvial Land Association, 64 p.

Stanturf, J.A., and Gardiner, E.S., 2000, Restoration of bottomland hardwoods in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, in Sustaining Forests: the Science of Forest Assessment, Southern Forest Resource Assessment, <http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/sustain/conf/ppr/stanturf/index.htm/>.

Smith, P.B., Twedt, D.J., Wiedenfeld, D.A., Hamel, P.B., Ford, R.P., and Cooper, R.J., 1993, Point counts of birds in bottomland hardwood forests of the Mississippi Alluvial Valley - duration, minimum sample size, and points versus visits: New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, Southern Experiment Station, Research Paper SO-274, 21 p.

Twedt, D.J., and Loesch, C.R., 1999, Forest area and distribution in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley - implications for breeding bird conservation: Journal of Biogeography, v. 26, p. 1215-1224.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi River Commission, 1988, Forest vegetation of the leveed floodplain of the Lower Mississippi River: Vicksburg, Mississippi, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi River Commission, Lower Mississippi River Environmental Program, Report no. 11, 281 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, 1969, A forest atlas of the South: New Orleans, Southern Forest Experiment Station, and Asheville, North Carolina, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 27 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, 1997, Forest type groups of the United States, map scale 1:7,500,000, in Powell, D.S., Faulkner, J.L., Darr, D.R., Zhu, Z., and MacCleery, D.W., Forest Resources of the United States: Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-234, 132 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - National Agricultural Statistics Service, 1999, Census of agriculture, 1997, v. 2, subject series, part 1, agricultural atlas of the United States: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 163 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service), Various county soil surveys of Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, and Kentucky.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998, Draft Ecological Framework map tile 16b (Louisiana and Arkansas), Major land resource area concepts - STATSGO vs. MLRA: Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S. Department of Agriculture, - Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center in cooperation with CALMIT-University of Nebraska, map scale 1:1,000,000.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, 1981, Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States (text and maps): Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, Agriculture Handbook 296, 156 p., map scale 1:7,500,000.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, 1974, General soil map, State of Mississippi: Mississippi State Department of Agriculture and Commerce, 2 sheets, map scale 1:750,000.

U.S. Department of Commerce - Bureau of the Census, 1995, Census of agriculture, 1992, v. 2, subject series, part 1, agricultural atlas of the United States: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 204 p.

U.S. Department of the Interior - National Park Service, 1998, Lower Mississippi Delta region, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee - heritage study: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of the Interior - National Park Service, v. 2, 292 p.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1979, The Yazoo basin - an environmental overview: Jackson, Mississippi, Jackson Area Office, Fish and Wildlife Service Planning Aid Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 39 p.

U.S. Geological Survey, 1986, Land use and land cover data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-scale maps: Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey, Data Users Guide no. 4.

U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, National Wetlands Research Center, 2000, Lower Mississippi Valley GAP Land use/Land cover, (digital coverage).

Vining, J.W., 1982, Mississippi agriculture in the early American geographies: Mississippi Geographer, v. 10, p. 18-23.

Wharton, C.H., Kitchens, W.M., and Sipe, T.W., 1982, The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast - a community profile: Washington, D.C., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-81/37, 133 p.

Woods, A.J. Omernik, J.M., Martin, W.H., Pond, G.J., Andrews, W.M., Call, S.M., Comstock, J.A., and Taylor, D.D., 2002, Ecoregions of Kentucky (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey, map scale 1:1,000,000.

Westerfield, P.W., 1991, Ground-water levels in the alluvial aquifer in eastern Arkansas, 1990 [microform]: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 91-248, 24 p.

Overview_Description Entity_and_Attribute_Overview

Arc attributes

9 = state border

8 = coastline

4 = level 4 ecoregion boundary

3 = level 3 ecoregion boundary

Attributes: Polygon coverage- polygons identified by ecocode

ECO ECO_CODE

73 Mississippi Alluvial Plain

73a Northern Holocene Meander Belts

73b Northern Pleistocene Valley Trains

73c St. Francis Lowlands

73d Northern Backswamps

73e Grand Prairie

73f Western Lowlands Holocene Meander Belts

73g Western Lowlands Pleistocene Valley Trains

73h Arkansas/Ouachita River Holocene Meander Belts

73i Arkansas/Ouachita River Backswamps

73j Macon Ridge

73k Southern Holocene Meander Belts

73l Southern Pleistocene Valley Trains

73m Southern Backswamps

73n Inland Swamps

73o Deltaic Coastal Marshes and Barrier Islands

74 Mississippi Valley Loess Plains

74a Bluff Hills

Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:
REQUIRED: The year (and optionally month, or month and day) for which the data set corresponds to the ground.
Currentness_Reference:
REQUIRED: The basis on which the time period of content information is determined.
Status:
Progress: REQUIRED: The state of the data set.
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency:
REQUIRED: The frequency with which changes and additions are made to the data set after the initial data set is completed.
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -92.525413
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -88.098311
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.457045
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 28.897483
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus:
REQUIRED: Reference to a formally registered thesaurus or a similar authoritative source of theme keywords.
Theme_Keyword:
REQUIRED: Common-use word or phrase used to describe the subject of the data set.
Access_Constraints:
REQUIRED: Restrictions and legal prerequisites for accessing the data set.
Use_Constraints:
REQUIRED: Restrictions and legal prerequisites for using the data set after access is granted.
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535

Data_Quality_Information:
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: z:\ecoregions\msalluv_eco

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Complete chain
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 1590
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Label point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 378
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: GT-polygon composed of chains
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 378
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 1647

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: Albers Conical Equal Area
Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:
Standard_Parallel: 29.500000
Standard_Parallel: 45.500000
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -96.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 23.000000
False_Easting: 0.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000484
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000484
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: D_Clarke_1866
Ellipsoid_Name: Clarke 1866
Semi-major_Axis: 6378206.400000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 294.978698

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: map_eco.aat
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FNODE#
Attribute_Definition: Internal node number for the beginning of an arc (from-node).
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: TNODE#
Attribute_Definition: Internal node number for the end of an arc (to-node).
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LPOLY#
Attribute_Definition: Internal node number for the left polygon.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RPOLY#
Attribute_Definition: Internal node number for the right polygon.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LENGTH
Attribute_Definition: Length of feature in internal units.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MAP_ECO#
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MAP_ECO-ID
Attribute_Definition: User-defined feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LNTYPE
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: map_eco.pat
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: AREA
Attribute_Definition: Area of feature in internal units squared.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PERIMETER
Attribute_Definition: Perimeter of feature in internal units.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MAP_ECO#
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MAP_ECO-ID
Attribute_Definition: User-defined feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: NAME
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ECO
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ECO_NAME

Distribution_Information:
Resource_Description: Downloadable Data
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Transfer_Size: 0.926

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20041005
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
REQUIRED: The organization responsible for the metadata information.
Contact_Person: REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:
REQUIRED: The mailing and/or physical address for the organization or individual.
City: REQUIRED: The city of the address.
State_or_Province: REQUIRED: The state or province of the address.
Postal_Code: REQUIRED: The ZIP or other postal code of the address.
Contact_Voice_Telephone:
REQUIRED: The telephone number by which individuals can speak to the organization or individual.
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile

Generated by mp version 2.8.6 on Tue Oct 05 17:05:11 2004